<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Fallbrook Loses Out to Charlotte Catholic</title>
		<description>Discuss Fallbrook Loses Out to Charlotte Catholic</description>
		<link>http://rugbymag.com/boys/918-fallbrook-loses-out-to-charlotte-catholic.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:30:06 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/918/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Red says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/boys/918-fallbrook-loses-out-to-charlotte-catholic.html#comment-2745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Based on the article it's apparent the writer was expecting (hoping for?) Fallbrook to win. The headline, the interview with the losing coach, the phrase "despite the outstanding Fallbrook defense", etc. I don't want to take anything away from Fallbrook - they were physical and talented - but why not give credit where credit is due?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:36:57 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/boys/918-fallbrook-loses-out-to-charlotte-catholic.html#comment-2745</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
