<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>GoffonRugby: How the CSC Got it Exactly Wrong</title>
		<description>Discuss GoffonRugby: How the CSC Got it Exactly Wrong</description>
		<link>http://rugbymag.com/goff-on-rugby/909-goffonrugby-how-the-csc-got-it-exactly-wrong.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:57:24 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/909/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>rugbyfan1 says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/goff-on-rugby/909-goffonrugby-how-the-csc-got-it-exactly-wrong.html#comment-2488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[from nigel melville - Here is the quote: "The Grievance Panel has determined that in regards to the 'Aspen Players Incident', the procedures and the ultimate decisions of the USARFU staff, panels and committees were proper and in conformity with the USARFU by-laws and regulations. Therefore, the Appellate Panel's ruling remains undisturbed and the grievance is denied in its entirety."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>rugbyfan1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 08:52:34 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/goff-on-rugby/909-goffonrugby-how-the-csc-got-it-exactly-wrong.html#comment-2488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>chip3 says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/goff-on-rugby/909-goffonrugby-how-the-csc-got-it-exactly-wrong.html#comment-2417</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Rugby Committee has authority over the CSC and the following is the description of the Rugby Committee right from USAR's website, "The Rugby Committee (RC) will normally appraise recommendations from established committees and ensure that due diligence has been performed, that there are no procedural omissions, that best practices have been applied, and that the decisions and policies of the established committees are not in conflict with each other, prior to sending to the President of Rugby Operations for disposition and/or enforcement." How on Earth did this pass the Rugby Committee??? http://www.usarugby.org/#cc=[Application]\\ Structure\\Cont ent\\Brand Resource Center\\Content \\Home\\20907F3F-1296-66EA-DD8E-5E2AF35B49C0\\20907F3F-129C-3DB7-096D-04AA3AB59358\\21D941EA-129D-E716-FC2A-2CDBB4CF5090\\2 1D941C5-129F-63B4-0797-4C8F11690AB3{{Tab:View}}]]></description>
			<dc:creator>chip3</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 12:45:55 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/goff-on-rugby/909-goffonrugby-how-the-csc-got-it-exactly-wrong.html#comment-2417</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>flickingtail says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/goff-on-rugby/909-goffonrugby-how-the-csc-got-it-exactly-wrong.html#comment-2416</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's "instance", not instant. And "play" soccer, not player soccer. Please proof before you post. But you are correct.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>flickingtail</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 12:39:33 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/goff-on-rugby/909-goffonrugby-how-the-csc-got-it-exactly-wrong.html#comment-2416</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
