<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Women Eagles Need Support for Tour</title>
		<description>Discuss Women Eagles Need Support for Tour</description>
		<link>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/6273-women-eagles-need-support-for-tour.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:43:23 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/6273/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>deckside says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/6273-women-eagles-need-support-for-tour.html#comment-16862</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Define succesful. The win loss ratio may be better but the mens can sell out stadiums in Houston and play in front of huge crowds and get tv coverage for the WC.While I support womens rugby, it is hard not to notice that teir 1 womens comps dont pull more than a handful of spectators. USA rugby has plenty to be shameful about and I will donate but its hard to fault them for giving a brand with much less return on an investment an equal share.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>deckside</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:11:42 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/6273-women-eagles-need-support-for-tour.html#comment-16862</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CRugbymom says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/6273-women-eagles-need-support-for-tour.html#comment-16857</link>
			<description><![CDATA[USA Rugby should be ashamed of themselves - the women's team has been much more successful than the men's on the world stage, and they are begging for traveling money?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CRugbymom</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:07:59 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/6273-women-eagles-need-support-for-tour.html#comment-16857</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
