<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Central Missouri to Replace Texas Tech</title>
		<description>Discuss Central Missouri to Replace Texas Tech</description>
		<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:42:34 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/4214/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>RNR says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12480</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also Texas Tech's starters are full of freshman so allowing the team to save money and plan for the years to come, why would that ever be looked down upon. You all just wait and see what they will do, i promise you wont be dissapointed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RNR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:54:20 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12480</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RNR says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12479</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Tech rugby is a club worth recognizing and not to be put down due to something out of the teams control. not having enough money to travel i will agree is a bit sad and probably because of poor planning however if saving whta money they have to put into next years team is what they decide is the best idea then no one should have trash to talk. Tech rugby earned their spot and everyone who has read this should show some respect not to mention Central Missouri should be grateful for the chance to play on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RNR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:50:37 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12479</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>key says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12255</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Gentlemen, let me remind you that this is the same Tech team that had an article recently where they were quoted whining about how they should be D1AA and how they'd be much better than Rice because they beat them years ago. Let me remind you that Rice went to DII play offs and went to sweet 16 a few years ago when they were DII, they had what it took to go to westerns and put in the effort and earned their spot back to D1. There's a lot more to this than just the writer on this article constantly implying that this team would be top 3 in SWC when they can't even rally enough support or enough players to go to nationals. There's a reason why they are DII. end of story.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>key</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:25:48 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12255</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SoCalRugger says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With tackling like that the Texas Tech coach has more to be embarrassed about than making excuses why the team will not go to nationals.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SoCalRugger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:04:58 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12237</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>patrickeclifton says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12229</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If Tech were in the Southwest, they wouldn't have spent a bunch of money to get to St. Louis for the West final, thus would potentially have the money to get to Wisconsin. From every conversation I had with anyone from the Southwest, the depth of the club was never brought up. It was always the travel to Lubbock. My best guess? Tech would have finished in the top three in the Southwest.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>patrickeclifton</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:39:54 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12229</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>notpayingtocomment says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12226</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you whine about not being accepted into the higher division, you can't bail on the national playoffs and quote depth as a reason - if injuries cause that much of a problem, then you weren't qualified to play in the higher division.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>notpayingtocomment</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:10:40 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12226</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Huh? says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12221</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well first of all, they knew for a while that this was where they would have to go and they certainly seemed pretty confident that they would get there from their comments in the previous articles about them. So why not have the money budgeted for the trip? My point is that a team that has such little depth that they would forfeit a trip to the national playoffs (when they stated that that "nationals" is all they cared about), maybe didn't have what the Southwest conference was looking for in a member team. If they had won the Southwest Conference they would be going TO THE EXACT SAME PLACE. Would they have forfeited then? That would have been a huge black mark on that conference, just like it is a huge black mark on the West TU now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:56:13 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12221</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@patclifton says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12220</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wasn't the conference's argument that Tech was too unorganized and constantly had issues? Only Tech claims it was a travel issue. This seems to confirm the SWC's decision. Also, can't help but notice they might be ducking the trip since they're in a pool with Lindenwood and Whitewater. I was at Westerns - Tech didn't suddenly have a rash of injuries.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>@patclifton</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:31:03 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12220</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@huh? says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12209</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It does seem odd, especially since they note injuries. I don't know of many teams in the entire country that could afford a trip of that distance and justify going with a ridiculous amount of injuries? And if you are possibly part of a D-1AA team in Texas I would be careful because you will most likely have to play the same team you are running your mouth about...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>@huh?</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:49:08 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12209</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>patrickeclifton says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12206</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems odd that the fact Tech couldn't travel to Wisconsin is somehow defense for the conference of teams that couldn't drive cross-state to Tech.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>patrickeclifton</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:55:11 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/men's-dii-college-/4214-central-missouri-to-replace-texas-tech.html#comment-12206</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
