<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Miami Pleased With Bowl Performance</title>
		<description>Discuss Miami Pleased With Bowl Performance</description>
		<link>http://rugbymag.com/news/colleges/collegiate-sevens/2992-miami-pleased-with-bowl-performance.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:49:37 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/2992/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>7s Fan says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/news/colleges/collegiate-sevens/2992-miami-pleased-with-bowl-performance.html#comment-9641</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Having trailed less that two minutes all of day one, Miami’s National Title hopes were dashed." Miami also trailed most of the first half against Virginia in their first match of day 1.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>7s Fan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:38:38 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/news/colleges/collegiate-sevens/2992-miami-pleased-with-bowl-performance.html#comment-9641</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GrantCole says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/news/colleges/collegiate-sevens/2992-miami-pleased-with-bowl-performance.html#comment-9637</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That match was just too fast for the ref assigned. The schedulers could've made a different - and by different, I mean more fair to both teams - choice for this match. Miami had a great attitude though and just plunged on through Saturday (their leftover Movember 'staches were awesome!).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GrantCole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:44:28 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/news/colleges/collegiate-sevens/2992-miami-pleased-with-bowl-performance.html#comment-9637</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
