<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>USA Hands RSA First Nations Cup Win</title>
		<description>Discuss USA Hands RSA First Nations Cup Win</description>
		<link>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/1658-usa-hands-rsa-first-nations-cup-win.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:19:59 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://rugbymag.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/1658/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Heather Hale says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/1658-usa-hands-rsa-first-nations-cup-win.html#comment-5460</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It would be sweet if everyone embraced the idea that this group is at the beginning of a journey. I have no doubt that this team and staff(like ALL past teams and staff) will learn and grow from this tour. Yes, this last loss was especially disappointing considering expectations, but it is early yet, and it benefits no one to spend time focusing on the negative and trying to polarize people by comparing staffs. Save those comments for Jeannie the Greek's site please... (if they return...) Good luck Eagles! p.s. I also am bothered by the anonymity under which people choose to comment. If you believe that what you are saying is valid, then own it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Heather Hale</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:11:21 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/1658-usa-hands-rsa-first-nations-cup-win.html#comment-5460</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>shocking says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/1658-usa-hands-rsa-first-nations-cup-win.html#comment-5418</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, a shocking and disappointing loss. In three games the US went from nearly beating the world number 2 to losing to an awful team. Players are not playing for the new coaching staff or for each other. A shame really since this the only level at which we are competitive (or used to be).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>shocking</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:51:02 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/1658-usa-hands-rsa-first-nations-cup-win.html#comment-5418</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Really? says:</title>
			<link>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/1658-usa-hands-rsa-first-nations-cup-win.html#comment-5416</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Really, no one has anything to say about this? We performed well against England but couldn't perform against Canada, and then dropped a match to a team we're supposed to beat soundly. If it was a diaster at first and got better I would applaud the coaching but this is outrageous. Rumor mill has it the team hasn't even had a real training since Canada. After England all the Steinberg supporters were all on this site applauding his genius. What you have to say now? This feels like a repeat of his performance as an NA4 coach. Can we end the experiment now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Really?</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:18:35 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://rugbymag.com/usa-women-/1658-usa-hands-rsa-first-nations-cup-win.html#comment-5416</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
